Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of TechniColor


Ignore:
Timestamp:
11/15/10 16:30:36 (10 years ago)
Author:
CP3-Origins
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • TechniColor

    v3 v4  
    1111
    1212
    13 === Description of the model & references ===
     13=== Description of the model and references ===
     14
     15Minimal Walking Technicolor (MWT) is an extension of the Standard Model featuring a new strong sector based on a new gauge group SU(2) technicolor with a doublet of Dirac fermions in the adjoint representation.
     16
     17Next to Minimal Walking Technicolor (NMWT) is a similar extension, but based the gauge group SU(3) technicolor with a doublet of Dirac fermions in the two-index symmetric representation.
     18
     19Our implementation makes use of the effective low-energy model containing scalars, pseudoscalars, vector mesons and other fields predicted by the models. The implemented model is the simplest one, which contains only the composite states, which are expected to be the most important for collider phenomenology. These are the composite Higgs, and the vector and axial spin-one resonances. For these states the effective theories of MWT and NMWT coincide.
     20
     21    * Phys. Rev. D 71, 051901 (2005) [http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0405209] - F. Sannino and K. Tuominen, ''Orientifold Theory Dynamics and Symmetry Breaking''. Note that the original name was ''Techniorientifold''
     22    * Phys. Lett. B597:89-93,2004 [http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0406200] - Deog Ki Hong, Stephen D.H. Hsu, F. Sannino, ''Composite Higgs from higher representations''
     23    * Phys. Rev. D72:055001, 2005 [http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0505059]  - D.D. Dietrich, F. Sannino, K. Tuominen ''Light composite Higgs from higher representations versus electroweak precision measurements: Predictions for CERN LHC''
     24    * Phys. Rev. D 75, 085018 (2007) [http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0611341] - D. D. Dietrich and F. Sannino, ''Conformal window of SU(N) gauge theories with fermions in higher dimensional representations''. Note that the original name was “Walking in the SU(N)”
     25    * Phys. Rev. D 76, 055005 ( 2007) [http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.1696] - R. Foadi, M.T. Frandsen, T. A. Ryttov, F. Sannino, ''Minimal Walking Technicolor: Set Up for Collider Physics''
     26    * Phys. Rev. D 79, 035006 (2009) [http://arxiv.org/abs/0809.0793] – A. Belyaev, R. Foadi, M.T. Frandsen, M. Jarvinen, A. Pukhov, F. Sannino, ''Technicolor Walks at the LHC''
     27    * For the construction at the Lagrangian level of the terms involving the space-time epsilon tensor – representing the correct generalization of the Wess-Zumino-Witten topological term – involving massive spin one fields see Acta Phys. Polon. B40:3533-3743, 2009 [http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.0931] – F. Sannino, ''Conformal Dynamics for TeV Physics and Cosmology''
     28
    1429
    1530One popular Beyond the Standard Model theory is the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM). Its main features are to link bosons with fermions and unify internal and external symmetries. Moreover, it allows for a stabilization of the gap between the Planck and the electroweak scale and for gauge coupling unification at high energies, provides a dark matter candidate as the lightest supersymmetric particle and appears naturally in string theories. However, since supersymmetric particles have not yet been discovered, supersymmetry must be broken at low energies, which makes the superpartners massive in comparison to their Standard Model counterparts.